Robert,
I have suggested on s3veral occasions on this mailing list that
condensers should not be replaced unless they have failed. There is
plenty of anecdotal evidence to suggest that condensers have a high
early failure rate, but those that survive early failure will last
for a long time (many decades).
Hence, by routinely replacing condensers, you are much more likely to
have a condenser fail, because you risk the early failure of your
newly replaced condenser.
Simon
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Robert J. Guinness
<guinness@stclegal.com> wrote:
> I want to thank all those who offered advice on diagnosing my MGA's
> sputtering and dieing engine. The culprit was a bad condenser (which I
> replaced less than a year ago). Are our parts sources becoming unreliable?
> I had to replace the points I installed at the same time. Have others
> experienced bad mechanical replacement parts lately (as opposed to body,
> rubber, interior, etc.), or is it just me? Or did the bad new condenser
> cause problems with the points?
> --
> Robert Guinness
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
> database 4637 (20091125) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> Mgs@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs
>
> http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Mgs@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs
http://www.team.net/archive
|