mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: carb conversion dilemma

To: MG List <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: carb conversion dilemma
From: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:40:55 -0700
Good question. The way I see it...

...you need some kind of crankcase venting, so rule out blocking off the
breather tube.

...you probably don't want it connected to a constantly varying vacuum,
either, so don't just run it directly to the manifold port.

In your situation, I would be inclined to acquire the original style PCV
valve and use that. At least you could be assured that the configuration
works and doesn't cause problems down the line. A used one would be OK since
you can replace the rubber diaphragm.

This also has the advantage of being "correct".

My 2"...

on 7/24/01 3:42 PM, David Councill at dcouncil@imt.net wrote:

> I'm in the final phases of a carb conversion. Not a standard one and that
> is where the problem lies.
> 
> The car is a 65 MGB with an 18V engine (from a 72 but the number indicates
> a later block). We are switching the HIF carbs (also from a 72) with the
> HS4 carbs that probably were originally with the 65.
> 
> The problem is with the crankcase breather if I'm using the correct term.
> On the 70s models, this tube has a Y-splitter that splits the one tube into
> two which connect to ports on the sides of the SU carbs. The older SU carbs
> do not have these ports. Instead, the tube connects to the PCV valve that
> goes into the intake manifold.
> 
> I'm inclined to plug this tube off. Can I do this? Or do I need a vacuum on
> the line?
> 
> In short, any one else encounter this problem and if so, how did you handle
> it?
> 
> David

--

Max Heim
'66 MGB GHN3L76149
If you're near Mountain View, CA,
it's the red one with the silver bootlid.

///
///  mgs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  (If they are dupes, this trailer may also catch them.)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>