mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MG supercharger

To: "Kai M. Radicke" <kmr@pil.net>
Subject: Re: MG supercharger
From: "Andrew B. Lundgren" <lundgren@byu.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:19:23 -0700 (MST)
But that 1800 engine needs to be very healthy before you slap the SC on it,  
that can set you back another $1000...

I emailed back and forth with them for a bit.  To get the kind of power he is 
talking about you have to have uprated valve springs to keep from floating 
them.  I believe he was talking about 7000-8000 RPM top end.  The sounds my car 
makes 5000 aren't that pretty!

But tempting if you have the $ none the less.

On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Kai M. Radicke wrote:

> > A Bit Pricey?????  That seems to me to be about the Understatement of this
> > millennium.
> >
> > Larry
> 
> It isn't pricey, it is a bargain!
> 
> There is no way you could spend $3700 on your MGB, and gain the same
> performance and uniqueness that Han's supercharger kit offers.  The only
> viable alternative is a Rover V8 conversion, and that isn't as unique... nor
> as simple to install (sure you can buy everything for less than $3700, but
> how many hours do you need to install it all and modify your MGB to suit?).
> The supercharger route wins hands down in all categories.
> 
> The nice thing about Han's kit is that it uses a Lyshom twin-screw type
> supercharger.  Extremely efficient!  Where a modern roots type maxes out at
> about 62% efficiency.... the Lyshom starts at about 80%.
> 
> The only penalty, and a slight one at that, of adding a supercharger is you
> gain about 30 pounds of weight on the front end (you could slightly offset
> this if you go for one of those aluminium heads).
> 
> Anyone thinking about going the V8 conversion route, and who has the money
> already set aside, I would advise you to seriously rethink it!
> 
> Kai
> 
> --
> Kai M. Radicke -- kai@radickemedia.com
> 1974 Triumph TR-6 Supercharged (Eaton)
> http://www.pil.net/~felix/supercharger/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>