Dear Dr. Doug,
On Mon, 9 Feb 1998, doug russell wrote:
=%OWell John, you're questionable television viewing habits aside, I cannot
vouch
=%Ofor the truthfulness of this story other than to say it was given to me by a
=%Olawyer friend and advertised as "truth" ... so please consider the source.
With all due "respect" to the legal profession, their definition of
"truth" is quite a bit different from the definition I use. The former is
defined by a jury and a judge, whereas mine is supposed to be decided by
Nature, although I may misinterprete it from time to time ;)
I've also noticed that logical processes seem to escape LBC
trouble-shooting far more often than I'd like..
"Never ascribe to Malice that which can be explained by Ignorance"
John J. Peloquin
Molecular Biology &
Biochemistry
3205 BioSciences II
UC IRVINE
Irvine, CA 92697-3900
jpeloqui@uci.edu
|