mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Chrome vs. Rubber

To: frankk@BusinessOn.com
Subject: Re: Chrome vs. Rubber
From: Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1998 15:08:17 +0000
Frank R. Krajewski wrote:
> 
> Paul Hunt wrote:
> >
> > Frank R. Krajewski wrote:
> > >
> > > I invite anyone who prefers the rubber bumper B to the chrome bumper to
> > > test drive my 1964 B with app. 95 stock HP and then my 1980 MGBLE with
> > > app. 60 HP(after a good tune up!). Then extol the virtues of that rubber
> > > bumpered B. I love them both but the 64 is a true sports car performance
> > > wise. The 1980 is a very nice leisurely touring automobile the the SO
> > > appreciates.
> > > Frank Krajewski (RI "Swamp Yankee")
> >
> > You're confusing the effects of the rubber bumpers with the effects of the 
>(US)
> > smog controls.
> >
> > PaulH.
> Paul:
> Do those heavy rubber bumbers delete that extra 35 horsepower?
> Frank

Only if they are stuffed in the carb intakes.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>