mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: It was the starter

To: "Peter Schauss x 2014" <ps4330@okc01.jccbi.gov>, mgs@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: RE: It was the starter
From: "doug russell" <dr-doug@classic.msn.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 97 17:52:36 UT
Peter,

Yes, you are absolutely right.  As a matter of fact, 2 years ago I spent a 
bundle on a rebuilt starter hoping to solve a similar problem with my C GT.  
Installed the newly refurbished unit and ... same symptoms!!  A new battery 
didn't do it either.  Ended up being a bad ground connection from the (-) post 
to the body.  Jeez, that hurt.  I suppose there's a fundamental diagnostic 
moral in here somewhere but if I told you what it is I'd have to publicly 
admit to being a knucklehead so you're on your own!

Dr. Doug 

A few 69 MGs - all of which have shiny, frequently cleaned, ground 
connections. 

-----Original Message-----
From:   owner-mgs@autox.team.net  On Behalf Of Peter Schauss x 2014
Sent:   Tuesday, November 04, 1997 11:05 AM
To:     mgs@autox.team.net
Subject:        It was the starter

In my last post on this subject, I said that I thought I had solved
the problem of a sluggish starter (sounded like a dead battery but wasn't)
by reseating the lead from the ignition switch to the solenoid.

Well, that held up until the middle of last week.  I stopped at the
postoffice on my way home and when I got back into the car, it barely 
turned over at all.  Having apparently eliminated all other sources
of the problem, I took a chance and ordered a rebuilt starter.
I installed it last night and the problem is definitely solved. In the
six years that I have owned the car, the starter has never turned over
so fast, even when I installed the last rebuilt starter three years ago.

So the moral of the story is that a worn starter can cause symptoms
which sound like a dead battery.

Peter Schauss
ps4330@okc01.jccbi.gov
schauss@worldnet.att.net
1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II
1980 MGB



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>