mgb-v8
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Air filter

To: "Allen Wulf" <wulfmgbv8@attbi.com>, "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@marketvalue.net>, "MG V8 List" <mgb-v8@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Air filter
From: "james" <jamesnazarian@netzero.net>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 23:09:49 -0600
References: <005801c1facf$7a6777a0$6501a8c0@LARRY> <002701c1fb01$8e943060$2db6fd0c@attbi.com>
Reply-to: "james" <jamesnazarian@netzero.net>
Sender: owner-mgb-v8@autox.team.net
Now here's a guy how has his sh*t way more together than I do.  Way to go
Al.

james
----- Original Message -----
From: Allen Wulf <wulfmgbv8@attbi.com>
To: Larry Hoy <larryhoy@marketvalue.net>; MG V8 List <mgb-v8@autox.team.net>
Sent: 13 May, 2002 10:41 PM
Subject: Re: Air filter


> Larry,  There is an interesting article in the April 2002 issue of Car
Craft
> testing various sizes of air cleaners  a 520hp Chrysler 448ci engine.
With
> no air cleaner it dynoed at 519hp; a 7 inch odx 3 inch tall 520, etc.
They
> tested with everything from no air filter to 14"od X 6" tall.  It produced
> the most hp(522hp) with a 14" od X 2.25 " tall, 7/8 drop base.
>
> On my own 215 V8 I didn't notice any increase in performance when I
switched
> from the 2.25" 14" paper filter to the 2.5" 14" K&N.  I could have bought
a
> lot of paper filters for what I paid for the K&N!
>
> Al

///
///  mgb-v8@autox.team.net mailing list
///  Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  Send list postings to mgb-v8@autox.team.net
///  Edit your replies!  If they include this trailer, they will NOT be sent.
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>