mgb-v8
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: intake manifold

To: "Jim Stuart" <vze3swyy@verizon.net>, "'MGB-V8'" <MGB-V8@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: intake manifold
From: "james" <jamesnazarian@netzero.net>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 21:02:56 -0600
References: <000201c1f15c$04ac4ad0$210110ac@HOME>
Reply-to: "james" <jamesnazarian@netzero.net>
Sender: owner-mgb-v8@autox.team.net
thanks Jim, but I am well beyond that.  My car is running and only lacks the
driveshaft to be done.

james
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Stuart <vze3swyy@verizon.net>
To: 'james' <jamesnazarian@netzero.net>; 'MGB-V8' <MGB-V8@autox.team.net>
Sent: 01 May, 2002 4:03 PM
Subject: RE: intake manifold


> James-
>
> Sounds like the engine is where it should be. Now, is it as low as it can
> be? The top edge of the metal base for the rubber puck at the frame rail
> should be slightly below the top edge of the frame rail. If not, loosen
the
> nut inside the frame mount. Find a long steel rod, or piece of steel angle
> and apply a BFH to the top end, with the bottom resting on the base of the
> rubber puck. You can usually gain fractional inches, going from 1 side to
> another. An additional benefit is that this puts the rubber in
compression,
> & extends the life of the rubber puck. When the engine torque twists the
> engine in the mounts, they uncompress rather than stretch. A small point
> unless you have to replace the driver's side rubber in 20,000 miles.
>
> Jim Stuart

///
///  mgb-v8@autox.team.net mailing list
///  Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  Send list postings to mgb-v8@autox.team.net
///  Edit your replies!  If they include this trailer, they will NOT be sent.
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>