To: | <Want1937hd@aol.com>, <saltracer@servusa.com>, <saltfever@comcast.net>, |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Engine Config |
From: | "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net> |
Date: | Mon, 3 Jan 2005 19:24:59 -0500 |
what would make you think a hemi has better combustion ? A Chrysler ad perhaps or the mystique of them that is pretty vastly overrated.. In the HP per liter deal they are not that special at all. same as a 500 hp 1 liter on nitro.. old F1 engines are way better than that. Depending of course what fantasy hp numbers you are buying into. I picked 5000 for 500 inches but am not a real believer in that one to be honest. It seems more like a one upsmanship thing to just toss the numbers around. Show me the real dyno sheet and then I might be a believer. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Want1937hd@aol.com [mailto:Want1937hd@aol.com] Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 9:52 AM To: saltracer@servusa.com; saltfever@comcast.net; ddahlgren@snet.net; land-speed@Autox.Team.Net Subject: Re: Engine Config In a message dated 01/03/2005 9:14:30 AM Eastern Standard Time, saltracer@servusa.com writes: If you took a stock 23 deg Chevy head and added overhead cams what did you gain? JB I've always thought the OHC allowed you to have a hemispherical compustion area with the valves at 90% to where they are on a rocker arm head. That gives better combustion and better flow. Bob in connecticut |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Production Class Rules?, desotoman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Engine Config, Dave Dahlgren |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Engine Config, John Beckett |
Next by Thread: | RE: Engine Config, Dave Dahlgren |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |