I fail to see this logic.......
with a shorter vehicle, it can be surmised that
the air is likely "less" attached, how would one
think that they could now "direct" that less attached
air at a more aggressive degree??
curious Joe :)
Quoting todd <todd@twinjugs.com>:
> I have a hard time believeing that the length of the vehicle in question is
> not a major factor in the optimum taper. My thoughts(based on my "very" minut
>
> amount of knowledge on this) are that the shorter the vehicle, the higher
> degree of taper needed.
> TD
> PS- i read everything a good handful of you have to say.. you included Pork
>
>
> > But what they found out - that the 6 degrees is the safe number -
> > depends to the shape and to the speed it could be up to 6.2 degrees
> > - which is a very interested point. In the earlier time the
> > equipment was not sensitive enough to register this different.
> >
> > If I get more information I will write a mail to the list.
> >
> > Think fast.....always
> >
> > Pork Pie
>
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent by http://webmail.rushmore.com
|