To: | "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>, <land-speed@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Bumps, Suspension, Etc. |
From: | "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com> |
Date: | Tue, 7 Sep 2004 10:56:21 -0500 |
Dave; This is very valuable data; thanks for sharing it. Your data acquisition system is probably sensitive enough to see periodic suspension movement due to small imbalance forces from the wheel/tire/rotor/hub assembly. Its frequency varies with speed. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ -----Original Message----- From: owner-land-speed@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-land-speed@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Dave Dahlgren Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004 4:29 AM To: land-speed@autox.team.net Subject: RE: Bumps, Suspension, Etc. "I have worked with the data quite a bit and tell you the following with a few reservations. The first one being we have to find a way to log this data both as down force and travel in inches. this will unfortunately for the short term require using 8 channels rather than 4. The reason being that the response curve in both down force and travel is not linear and is subject to using only 6 data points to make it linear. Not ideal but better than a straight line. Second is that the initial down force calibrations were done with a couple of assumptions that proved incorrect. The largest one being we were looking for lift and had more data points in the lift range than the down force range or at least they are over a wider range. What we got was down force over the entire run rather than lift so all the lift data points in the calibration were wasted. In places other than a gear change or other major input into the car the travel is small at Bonneville. Approximately 0.10 inches as an average but the car does move down with increased lift from the down force. So the movement is superimposed on a curve that is progressively showing more down force with the same chassis/wheel movement. There is some periodic movement in the suspension That is fairly regular but does move up in frequency with speed. I would suspect it is the natural frequency of the suspension or shocks and is somewhat different front to rear which would further support this thought as the rear suspension is much heavier....." Dave Dahlgren |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | E- Mail, Doug Odom |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Susps.-ect., ect., Dale.Clay |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Bumps, Suspension, Etc., John Goodman |
Next by Thread: | RE: Bumps, Suspension, Etc., John Goodman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |