To: | <land-speed@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Traction control |
From: | "The Weldons" <2weldons@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Mon, 22 Dec 2003 12:17:57 -0800 |
List-- my thoughts on traction control-- 1. I like to follow the rules until they're changed. If you really need to win by cheating in LSR events you should rethink your racing program and maybe compete someware else where "winning isn't everything; it's the only thing". 2. I think we should eventually legalize traction control. But first I'd like to see the following: --Serious development work via approved trial applications at the salt. --Maturing of the technology. This will be a long time in coming if Davis is the only source. Of course they have a right to make money off their patented idea. --Some of us figure out how it's done and duplicate it or go Davis one better. No one should infringe Davis' patents. But my guess (I haven't looked at their patent yet) is their patent is weak or they wouldn't be so secretive about it. But there is no infringement if you build & use it yourself and don't use it to make money. 3. I think the safety advantages will prove to outweigh the performance gains that could otherwise have a dampening effect on competition. 4. I believe there will be some classes where traction control will be more of an advantage than in other classes. One of us with connections to the SCTA/BNI technical committees ought to research and compile data on actual spin incidents and accidents on the Salt (and maybe El Mirage) to find common threads. 5. The only realistic way to do traction control is via the ignition or (possibly electronic fuel injection). You can't have any mechanical components. Their servo response is too slow. Even electronics can be too slow for extreme situations. That includes the driver (an electromechanical device). However, if the driver has to be in the loop you need a combination of well designed driver display and control and training via a computer simulator. Might be workable for a well built car that's not too fast or too easy to spin. 6. You could get away from rear wheel sensors by sensing chassis vibration modes with an accelerometer that picks up the changing fundamental frequencies from each wheel through FFT processing. Software would process the vibration mode info in a decision making process. My knowledge of the practicalities of doing it this way is low. I expect it would be a real "tour de force" in servo engineering. (Davis--I said it here--if Autox.team.net posts it, it's now in the public domain) Ed Weldon |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: TC the Devil's work, Flowbench |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: TC the Devil's work, Dave Dahlgren |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Traction Control, John Goodman |
Next by Thread: | Re: Traction Control, Bryan Savage |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |