Ok well here is one I stumbled upon, kind of CYA from these people. And
their claims of never producing a traction control HA-HA ask them why their
programmable timing computers are illegal.
http://www.msdignition.com/pdf/hei_traction_control.pdf
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
To: "James Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>; "John Burk"
<joyseydevil@comcast.net>; <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: Traction control
> With the current rules how do you plan on proving it does not control
> anything else? There are no tests that can not be easily defeated. I hope
no
> one thinks jacking the car up and running the engine driving the rear
wheels
> to see if they speed limit is a real test. With current wireless
technology
> devices do not have to be hard wired to each other in order to
communicate.
> Think cell phone, cordless phone, wireless networking and IR wireless.. A
> $79.00 cordless phone runs at 2.4 GHz with spead spectrum channel hopping.
> and comes with 2 transcevers plus a lot of other stuff you don't need. It
is
> not a 'Star Trek' sort of thing to have a device you can call with a cell
> phone and reprogram it.. As James said 'the cat is out of the bag'. The
> only way you can enforce TC rules is to remove every electrical device
from
> the car, including the battery.
>
> Dave
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>
> To: "John Burk" <joyseydevil@comcast.net>; <land-speed@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 1:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Traction control
>
>
> > Oh! Oh! The cat's out of the bag!!! If you were an inspector you'd know
> all
> > about these. Pretty simple huh!!!!
|