AMEN! and AMEN!
Tom
ARDUNDOUG@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 10/23/2003 4:17:38 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Nt788 writes:
> Hi Doug The reasoning on that was, when a group told me I could only go so
> fast to win, it then became corporate controlled and creativity was stifled!
>A
> 200club hopeful can get a real record with innovation, why should the record
> be set so high that only a guy who can afford 7engines be given the only
> chance? Another words if its to hot, spend more money.A Bill France quote:
>"Keep
> loading the wagon boys the horse is blind". Maybe the 2club can be like
>NASCAR
> someday! Jack
> Jack,
> You and I obviously have a different slant on the subject.The reasons
> most of us left drag racing are exactly as you stated. Regards the 7
> engines and a couple of cars, from my observations most of the guys in the
> Two-Club are not mega-buck types. There are many partnerships intended to
>share the
> expenses and labor, and yes, a few very well funded operations that are
> definitely in the minority.
> You and your operation probably best represent the hands-on approach.
>>From my observation point you literally do every aspect of building your cars
>and
> engines, sometimes with junk yard parts.
> I don't feel that the Two-Club minimums are unreasonable. They are simply
> intended to prevent someone "turkey-shooting" entry into the Club in a class
> with no record or a very soft existing number.
> If there is a Two-Club minimum that's unreasonable or unreachable I
> believe that Roy and the Board will listen to arguments that it should be
> lowered.........Ardun Doug King
|