Duhhhhhhh ABSOLUTELY....
Shoot why not just buy Don McMeekin's Skylark.... there are a million
class's you could run with the car and Dave's right.... it's tiny compared
to the Camaro....
It's for sale in Bonneville racing news at about half the price of what it
took to build and test it...
Keith
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
To: "Elon" <netstuff@attbi.com>
Cc: "LSR-List" <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:26 AM
Subject: Re: Slick Camaro
> Why would you pick a Camero??
> Couldn't find anything bigger??
>
> Seriously aren't there smaller GM cars that came with a v-8 if that is a
> requirement?? What about a v-8 monza it is 25% smaller in size.. and the
aero
> sucks on both but at least you have 25% less of it. Turk and I have talked
about
> this a million times. His car is way too big and that forces the chase for
big
> HP numbers to push it. A smaller car is cheaper and easier to make fast.
Think
> smallest hole in the air first and worry about cd later.. Remember it is
cd X
> sq. ft. or in the case of a Camero sq. yards..
> Dave
>
> Elon wrote:
> >
> > List: What is the cleanest aerodynamic Camaro in the years 70-81. I
went to
> > Mayf's web site (thanks Mayf) to check his list of vehicle drag data but
> > older Camaros are not listed.
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed
/// what is needed. It isn't that difficult, folks.
|