To: | Elon <netstuff@attbi.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Slick Camaro |
From: | Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net> |
Date: | Mon, 17 Mar 2003 06:26:58 -0500 |
Why would you pick a Camero?? Couldn't find anything bigger?? Seriously aren't there smaller GM cars that came with a v-8 if that is a requirement?? What about a v-8 monza it is 25% smaller in size.. and the aero sucks on both but at least you have 25% less of it. Turk and I have talked about this a million times. His car is way too big and that forces the chase for big HP numbers to push it. A smaller car is cheaper and easier to make fast. Think smallest hole in the air first and worry about cd later.. Remember it is cd X sq. ft. or in the case of a Camero sq. yards.. Dave Elon wrote: > > List: What is the cleanest aerodynamic Camaro in the years 70-81. I went to > Mayf's web site (thanks Mayf) to check his list of vehicle drag data but > older Camaros are not listed. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed /// what is needed. It isn't that difficult, folks. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Made in USA vs. "Them", Jonathan Amo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Slick Camaro, Keith Turk |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Slick Camaro, Jonathan Amo |
Next by Thread: | Re: Slick Camaro, Keith Turk |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |