alright, so who wants in on this
mph/displacement thing??? Rick?:)
come on Dave you can do better than
3.4, cars have a distinct aero advantage
over partially streamlined bikes (bricks)
so why cant you bust those "soft" Bonneville
bike mph/displacement achievments??
Joe(caffeine buzz peaking) Amo :)
Dave Dahlgren wrote:
>Thanks for the kind words.. And you are right the records are very soft.. I
>have
>a great idea for a new measure of efficiency.. mph/dispalcement... Maybe it is
>an old idea but new to me and has some merit in showing the relative efficiency
>of the vehicle.. Yes the small engine cars will win but that is the part I
>like..
>208 and 1 liter (61)=3.40
>219 and 1.5 liters(91.5 inches)= 2.39
>400 and 500 inches=0.80
>
>Dave
>
>Joe Amo wrote:
>
>>Dave I sure hope to see you at Bonneville soon!!!
>>
>>Not only do I like you and respect you, I wanna
>>see you get after those records!!!!
>>
>>I mean the 1.0 liter fuel lakester record is 3mph faster than
>>your 2.0 liter FL record, and the 1.5 liter record is 10 mph over it...
>>AND the 1.5 liter gas lakester record is 22mph over your
>>2.0 liter gas lakester record......
>>
>>PS (the folks with the 1.5 liter fuel record did it with 1052cc)
>>
>>will that fuel the fire???
>>
>>Joe (no southern manners) Amo :):)
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed
/// what is needed. It isn't that difficult, folks.
|