yeah yeah yeah, we could worry about that
and get excited
OR
show up at Bonneville and make runs
to your hearts content
Joe :)
Dick J wrote:
>What, California give you a hassle over driving on a dry lake bed which is
>located in a conservation area??? I can't believe that. They would just
>requirea $50,000 non-refundable environmental non-disturbance deposit; you'd
>have to run with OEM catalytic converters and mufflers; the car would have to
>not emit more than four decibels of sound; you would be restricted to tires
>with a four square foot contact patch; you would have to limit your speed to
>less than raising dust speed, and you would have to rake over all tire tracks
>when you were done. And then they would add strick restrictions that you
>wouldn't know about until AFTER your run!
>Dick J
> John Szalay wrote:At 07:28 AM 8/21/02 -0700, you wrote:
>
>>Other way around, the town is north of the dry lake bed. Actually, the dry
>>lake is in California. And unfortunately is in a Desert Conservation
>>area...and that may giv e me problems...
>>
>>mayf
>>
>
>Interesting, I was looking at the dry lake area north of town,
>did,nt even notice the one to the southwest.
>HotJobs, a Yahoo! service - Search Thousands of New Jobs
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed
/// what is needed. It isn't that difficult, folks.
|