To: | Jonathan Amo <webmaster@landracing.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: NT2 -vs- NT3 |
From: | "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com> |
Date: | Wed, 13 Feb 2002 08:33:26 -0800 |
My Cummins/Dodge tires are speed rated at 80mph. The owners manual recommends 70mph as a top speed. The fastest I ever got it going was indicated at 80 looking for gate 17 south of Ely. Rich Fox ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Amo" <webmaster@landracing.com> To: "Ed Van Scoy" <ed > Bull puckey if I ever heard of it. Why is it then its counter part the > Explorer and escape with same tires have a 112-115 mph speed rating. Or > even its rival the S10 pickups? Tires arent the issue. Then 01 ranger > has the lowest governed speed rating of EVERY car on the market. > Try again? > > Jonathan > > Ed Van Scoy wrote: > > > > > Yes It is a liability issue. The tires are not rated for higher speee. > > ed > > > > Jonathan Amo wrote: > > > >> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:15:34 -0700 > >> From: Jonathan Amo <webmaster@landracing.com> > >> To: Nt788@aol.com > >> Subject: Re: NT2 -vs- NT3 > >> > >> Well Jack damn you do have all the answers, can you tell me why my 2001 > >> Ford Ranger V6 4.0L has a speed limiter at 91 mph? > >> > >> Jonathan (who cant get to bonneville any faster than 91 mph) Amo /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: BELIEVE IT OR NOT-Funny, W S Potter |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: NT2 -vs- NT3, Nt788 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: NT2 -vs- NT3, john backus |
Next by Thread: | Re: NT2 -vs- NT3, Nt788 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |