To: | Nt788@aol.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: NT2 -vs- NT3 |
From: | Jonathan Amo <webmaster@landracing.com> |
Date: | Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:15:34 -0700 |
Well Jack damn you do have all the answers, can you tell me why my 2001 Ford Ranger V6 4.0L has a speed limiter at 91 mph? Jonathan (who cant get to bonneville any faster than 91 mph) Amo Nt788@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 2/11/2002 4:14:29 PM Pacific Standard Time, > webmaster@landracing.com writes: > > << Why NT3 would need more horsepower? >> > Jack Responds--- # 1 Neb III is heavier? # 2 Neb.II might use or average more > HP per run?#3 Neb. II engine gearbox combo 40yrs. more efficient? #4 Maybe > Neb. III really doesn't really have more HP! Nebulous Theorem /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: DrMayf castoffs, Bill Bennett |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: NT2 -vs- NT3, jkamo |
Previous by Thread: | Re: NT2 -vs- NT3, Paul Bland |
Next by Thread: | Re: NT2 -vs- NT3, jkamo |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |