land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Maxton Motorcycle engine class question

To: "Joe Amo" <jkamo@rapidnet.com>
Subject: Re: Maxton Motorcycle engine class question
From: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:35:04 -0500
Joe

The ECTA 2-cycle, 4-cycle classification structure was put in place because
that's what the scooter guys wanted. It's obviously doubles my data base of
records and makes extra work for me. My best guess is that about 95% of all
the records set are 4-cycle anyway. But the racers are happy and if works
for us.

Does the FIM make any distinction between the two?

JB

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Amo" <jkamo@rapidnet.com>
To: "Jim Dincau" <jdincau@qnet.com>
Cc: "Dale" <Dale@prodigy.net>; <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: Maxton Motorcycle engine class question


> I like being able to race against a variety of configurations, and think
the SCTA
> has a nice way of doing it by keeping the 2 and 4 strokes together.  I
mean we
> cant make a class separation for everything if there is a potential
suspected
> difference, do we need a rider weight class designation, or girth
designation?
> Even pushrod and overhead cammers used to be together, and many found NO
problem
> setting records that still stand with the pushrods.  Look at Dave Matsons
records
> (set with a Vincent motor) they were set in the generic
body/frame/displacement
> class, he didnt enter pushrod.  I mean you just find a way to do it.  In
line
> fours might have a hp advantange, but what about the narrowness of the
V-twin (an
> aero advantage), and the way a V-twin puts down power pulses (a traction
> advantage).
>
> Joe
>
> Jim Dincau wrote:
>
> > > Dale,
> > >    The E.C.T.A. recognizes that there are inherent differences between
2
> > > cycle (the /2 class) and four cycle (/4 designation) engines. The
other
> > > sacntions either..... (a) don't know there are differences (which I
don't
> > > believe)..... (b) don't care........ or (c) just don't think it
matters,
> > > because they are really old school car guys (most likely).
> >
> > Boy am I getting tired of this SCTA bashing.
> > The SCTA bike rules rules are made by bikers, there is an equal but
seperate
> > commitee and an annual meeting at speedweek.
> > Jim
> >
> > > As far as the designation for your motorcycle, Ducatis are a four
stroke
> > > design so it woul be a 1000/4 engine. P/P is a production pushrod
> > > designation . If your Ducati is a Desmo drive model and is stock in
all
> > > forms but tires it would be in a P/1000/4 class. P = Production, 1000
=
> > > displacement , 4 = four stroke.

///
///  land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>