land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: rules

To: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: rules
From: "Kim & Brad Johnson" <b091696@snowhill.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:50:14 -0600
Hey John....It seemed like such a simple question to me.  I sure did enjoy
everyone's remarks.  It is truly rewarding to finally make it to this forum.
I guess I'll just hang some more plastic inside to pacify the masses!  With
two doner cars to choose from, I've got lots!          Brad
-----Original Message-----
From: John Beckett <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>
To: dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com <dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com>;
land-speed@autox.team.net <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 11:46
Subject: Re: rules


>Doug
>
>I actually think this is a good exercise. Not everybody interrupts the
rules
>in the same way. What's absolutely clear to one is as thick as mud to
>another. This kind of discussion helps clarify things for the future. And
>maybe will lead to a  wording change.
>
>John Beckett, LSR #79
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com>
>To: <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; <land-speed@autox.team.net>
>Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 12:10 PM
>Subject: Re: rules
>
>
>> i guess i would personally have a tough time in tech inspection if i
>rolled
>> in with a production entry with some nice, well crafted, polished or
>> anodized beadrolled aluminum doorpanels and i started getting flack about
>> them from the rules commitee, while another production entry with old ,
>> ratty, mildewed original cardboard factory doorpanels slipped right thru,
>> with the rulebook written as is. (like having original doorpanel
>upholstery
>> is necessary to classify a car in the production category - come on !)
i
>> think we have beaten the rule interpretation issue to death on this
forum.
>> obviously one cannot build a legal entry just by reading the scta/bni
>> rulebook, since i wouldnt even think that this doorpanel issue would be
an
>> issue at all. rather , it appears that every aspect and detail of vehicle
>> construction must be approved another groups  consensus or jury rule
>> committee on a case basis via their interpretation, and not what the
>> rulebook says verbatim . whatever ------------------
>> ill shut up now- i dont even have a production ride
>> POSITIVE regards, doug @ black radon engineering
>>
>>
>
>
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>