i guess i would personally have a tough time in tech inspection if i rolled
in with a production entry with some nice, well crafted, polished or
anodized beadrolled aluminum doorpanels and i started getting flack about
them from the rules commitee, while another production entry with old ,
ratty, mildewed original cardboard factory doorpanels slipped right thru,
with the rulebook written as is. (like having original doorpanel upholstery
is necessary to classify a car in the production category - come on !) i
think we have beaten the rule interpretation issue to death on this forum.
obviously one cannot build a legal entry just by reading the scta/bni
rulebook, since i wouldnt even think that this doorpanel issue would be an
issue at all. rather , it appears that every aspect and detail of vehicle
construction must be approved another groups consensus or jury rule
committee on a case basis via their interpretation, and not what the
rulebook says verbatim . whatever ------------------
ill shut up now- i dont even have a production ride
POSITIVE regards, doug @ black radon engineering
|