healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Valve job\Oils....

To: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Valve job\Oils....
From: Dave & M <rusd@sitestar.net>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 16:16:49 -0600
Hi Bob,

Yes - Of course I meant SM. Please excuse fat fingers, dyslexic?

I got VV851 from my local auto parts store. He said they didn't have
any such until I gave him the part number.  It's frightfully expensive
though. I think for my use, a pint of EOS #1052367 combined with my
traditional VR1 20-50 will do the job at less cost.

Who knows how much longer GM will keep selling EOS, though. So far,
they have just changed the label & recommendations.

I'm especially interested in the subject since I AM breaking in a new
flat tappet cam & lifters.

Regards,
Dave Russell



Bob Spidell wrote:
 > Dave,
 >
 > So where can we get VV851?
 >
 > And did you mean "newer API rate SM oils?"
 >
 >
 > bs
 >
 >
 > Dave & M wrote:
 >
 >> Valvoline VR1 used to be one of the good guys.
 >>
 >> The latest batch of VR1, Valvoline Racing 20W-50, part # VV211,
 >> that I have, is clearly marked for API services SM, SL, CD. The
 >> newer API rated SL oils, by definition, must contain less or no
 >> ZDDP. You will note that  none of the most current oil analysis'
 >> for VR1 mention the ZDDP content any more. It used to be clearly
 >> listed in the MSDS.
 >>
 >> The current Valvoline Racing 20W-50, part # VV851, is clearly
 >> marked "not Street Legal", is not marked "VR1", & is clearly
 >> stated on the back that it contains "zinc & friction modifiers
 >> balanced with reduced detergents"  - "use of this oil may damage
 >> catalytic converters". It has no API rating for obvious reasons.
 >>
 >>
 >> To further confuse the issues, GM EOS # 1052367 (engine oil
 >> supplement) used to recommend adding one pint per oil change.
 >> Their new labeling calls it "Assembly Lubricant", not oil
 >> supplement, recommends it as assembly lube only, & does not
 >> recommend it as an additive to engine oil.
 >>
 >> In my personal opinion, Valvoline & GM have done an excellent job
 >> of disguising - confusing the issue. I guess, as always, you will
 >> make the final decisions. Chances are, if you are not breaking in
 >> a new cam & lifters, the current oils may get you by for a while.
 >>
 >>
 >> Regards, Dave Russell
 >>
 >>
 >> Tom Felts wrote:
 >>> I'm happy to see my oil, Val VR1 20/50 Racing oil, is one of
 >>> the "good guys.
 >>>
 >>>
 >>>
 >>>> [Original Message] From: Robert Blair <rnbmail@yahoo.com> To:
 >>>>  Warren Dietz <flyhihealey@hotmail.com>;
 >>>> <healeys@autox.team.net> Date: 5/12/2007 3:27:23 PM Subject:
 >>>> Re: Valve job\Oils....
 >>>>
 >>>> Warren,
 >>>>
 >>>> Good info - thanks.
 >>>>
 >>>> This is a hot topic as is quietly reducing the life span of
 >>>> older engines without the publics knowledge ..... seems to me
 >>>> that there should be a class of oils blended for older
 >>>> technology engines with no cats.
 >>>>
 >>>> Robert.
 >>>>
 >>>> --- Warren Dietz <flyhihealey@hotmail.com> wrote:
 >>>>
 >>>>
 >>>>> From: "T W" <ah3000me@gmail.com>
 >>>>>
 >>>>> Is there an oil additive available to replace the zinc? Tom
 >>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>> Here is interesting info..... although directed to
 >>>>> Porsche-aircooled, is relevant....
 >>>>>
 >>>>> http://www.lnengineering.com/oil.html
 >>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>> WD  67 BJ8
 >>>>>
 >>>>
 >>>>
 >>>> Robert - Yellow 65BJ8




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>