I am really at a loss of words to respond to a statement like this.
Randy Hicks
'56 100M
'62 BN7 MKII
'65 BJ8
'53 MGTD
Healey100M@gmail.com
On Nov 1, 2006, at 12:40 PM, Don wrote:
> Mark,
> If it wasn't for seat belt laws I would still drive without one and do
> it every time I take my healey out for a drive and yes I throw the
> kids
> in the back without a second thought. When your time is up no safety
> measure in this world is going to save you. Life is about risks
> and if
> you are unwilling to take them stay under the porch with the little
> dogs.
> Don
> 57' BN4 no belts and no third brake light, what a concept.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-healeys@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-
> healeys@autox.team.net]
> On Behalf Of Mark and Kathy
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 5:58 PM
> To: healeys@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: Seat Belts
>
> Sorry Patton, but the bullet proof , lead paneled, indostructo
> mobile is the only way to go when it comes to kids. Cute is fun
> sometimes but there are too many crazys on the road for you to go that
> far
> with the baby seats in the back.
>
> Either leave the kids at home or take the family car, it just isn't
> worth
> putting your love ones in that position.
>
> I'm really surprised that you can get insurance to cover the kids
> in the
>
> back seat in that car. Do you really think ANY type of seat belts are
> going
> to protect your loved ones when the the time comes.
>
> Put the 3 points in the front and leave the back seat for groceries,
> they're
> replaceable.
>
> It ain't worth it.
>
> Mark
|