--===============2309416009299978997==
--001a114ac94a525fd3053da7ab00
Glen,
Thanks for the reply. Only goes to reinforce the practice of assuming
nothing and measuring everything!
Jason
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:50 AM, fubog1 <fubog1@aol.com> wrote:
> Yes!
> I have run into that on several occasions but can't remember the Timken
> numbers, nor do I have a technical explanation.
> Glen
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Sukey <jsukey@gmail.com>
> To: FOT list <fot@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Thu, Sep 29, 2016 11:31 am
> Subject: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width?
>
> Has anyone else noticed rather large variation in carrier bearing width's
> when rebuilding a spitfire differential? The one I'm building right now,
> I've replaced what I suspect are the original bearings (Timken England)
> with brand new Timken USA bearings. In order to reach the required .004"
> preload, it will require .012" LESS total shim than what was in there
> originally. That seems like a big difference with the only variable being
> new bearings. I'm using the same housing, same carrier, the bearings
> visually look to be fully pressed home. Anyone else experience this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason Sukey
> _______________________________________________
> fot@autox.team.net
>
> http://www.fot-racing.com
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/
> options/fot/fubog1@aol.com
>
>
>
--001a114ac94a525fd3053da7ab00
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Glen,<div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Thanks for the reply.=C2=A0 =
Only goes to reinforce the practice of assuming nothing and measuring every=
thing!</div><div><br></div><div>Jason</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"=
><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:50 AM, fubog1 <s=
pan dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:fubog1@aol.com" target=3D"_blank">fub=
og1@aol.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl=
e=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><font c=
olor=3D"black" size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yes<font si=
ze=3D"2">!<br>
I have run into that on several occasions but can't remember the Timken=
numbers, nor do I have a technical explanation.<br>
Glen<br>
</font>
<div> <br>
</div>
<div> <br>
</div>
<div> <br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica;font-size:10pt;color:black"><div>=
<div class=3D"h5">-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Jason Sukey <<a href=3D"mailto:jsukey@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank"=
>jsukey@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: FOT list <<a href=3D"mailto:fot@autox.team.net" target=3D"_blank">fo=
t@autox.team.net</a>><br>
Sent: Thu, Sep 29, 2016 11:31 am<br>
Subject: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width?<br>
<br>
<div>
<div>
<div dir=3D"ltr">Has anyone else noticed rather large variation in carrier =
bearing width's when rebuilding a spitfire differential?=C2=A0 The one =
I'm building right now, I've replaced what I suspect are the origin=
al bearings (Timken England) with brand new Timken USA bearings.=C2=A0 In o=
rder to reach the required .004" preload, it will require .012" L=
ESS total shim than what was in there originally.=C2=A0 That seems like a b=
ig difference with the only variable being new bearings.=C2=A0 I'm usin=
g the same housing, same carrier, the bearings visually look to be fully pr=
essed home.=C2=A0 Anyone else experience this?
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks,<br>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Jason Sukey</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
<a>fot@autox.team.net</a><br>
<br>
<a>http://www.fot-racing.com</a><br>
<br>
Archive: <a>http://www.team.net/archive</a><br>
Forums: <a>http://www.team.net/forums</a><br>
1@aol.com</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a114ac94a525fd3053da7ab00--
--===============2309416009299978997==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net
http://www.fot-racing.com
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
--===============2309416009299978997==--
|