fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Vntage dry sump

To: <Gt6steve@aol.com>, <henry@henryfrye.com>
Subject: Re: Vntage dry sump
From: "Robert Dardano" <19to1tr6@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 21:07:20 -0400
We should all vote to let Steve design and develop
----- Original Message -----
From: <Gt6steve@aol.com>
To: <henry@henryfrye.com>
Cc: <FOT@autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: Vntage dry sump


> Thanx Henry, That's the answer I expected.  While I don't expect to ever
run
> with SVRA I'd still like to be legal.  Steve
> Steve,
>
> I think most cars in the east that run vintage appear to be built to SVRA
> specs. SVRA GR reads "Wet sump may not be converted to dry sump."
>
> http://svra.com/rules.htm
>
> FWIW, Les Gonda just built an MGBGT-V8 that is dry sumped.
>
> At 09:59 AM 05/21/2004 -0400, Gt6steve@aol.com wrote:
> >Amici,
> >What's the general opinion among the various vintage organizations
regarding
> >dry sumping a production car?  Was it permissible in 69 or 72 GCR's? Is
it
> >permissible in your club?
> >
> >I'm sure we've all seen dry sumped Lotus's running as well as Ginetta's.
> >Even a few Volvo's.  How would a dry sump Triumph go over?
> >
> >Steve (doesn't have a tank) Smith

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>