At 11:26 PM 3/17/99 -0600, Ronnie Day wrote:
>>Say, I'm no expert on ordnance, but wouldn't something recoiless
>>THAT size be considered legal if you called it a "supplemental
>>braking system"? :)
>>
>>dan.
>
>I think so, Dan, but to be used for braking the business end would have
>to be pointed aft. Of course that would take care of tailgating SUY's.
Wouldn't a recoilless rifle, by definition, be pretty useless as a braking
device? VERY effective on tailgaters, however. Probably be an excellent
deterrent.
Gordon Glasgow
Renton, WA
http://www.gordon-glasgow.org
|