To: | DWhitesdJr <DWhitesdJr@aol.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re[2]: Lotus / DeTomaso similarities |
From: | rebean@CCGATE.HAC.COM |
Date: | Wed, 11 Mar 98 05:39:42 PST8 |
DWhitesdJr <DWhitesdJr@aol.com> wrote on Date: 3/9/98 3:38 PM: >Hate to be anal about this, but the Lotus 30 had a 289 (4.7 liter) while the >Lotus 40 had a 302 (5 liters). At a couple of races, Team Lotus had problems >with the 302 and used a 289 as a backup. >Another difference was the 30 had a ZF 5DS30 box (similar to the Pantera) >while the 40 had a Hewland. Thanks for the correction. I didn't know and now I do (I'll try to remember). But I thought the 40 had *10* more mistakes... ;-) Rod |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | panasport wheel problem, PHILLIPBABCOCK |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: DeTomaso, rebean |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Lotus / DeTomaso similarities, DWhitesdJr |
Next by Thread: | Re: Lotus / DeTomaso similarities, Erik V. Berg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |