| To: | DWhitesdJr <DWhitesdJr@aol.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re[2]: Lotus / DeTomaso similarities | 
| From: | rebean@CCGATE.HAC.COM | 
| Date: | Wed, 11 Mar 98 05:39:42 PST8 | 
|      
DWhitesdJr <DWhitesdJr@aol.com> wrote on
Date:    3/9/98 3:38 PM:
>Hate to be anal about this, but the Lotus 30 had a 289 (4.7 liter) while the 
>Lotus 40 had a 302 (5 liters).  At a couple of races, Team Lotus had problems 
>with the 302 and used a 289 as a backup.
     
>Another difference was the 30 had a ZF 5DS30 box (similar to the Pantera) 
>while the 40 had a Hewland.
Thanks for the correction.  I didn't know and now I do (I'll try to 
remember).  But I thought the 40 had *10* more mistakes... ;-)
Rod
 | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | panasport wheel problem, PHILLIPBABCOCK | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: DeTomaso, rebean | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Lotus / DeTomaso similarities, DWhitesdJr | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Lotus / DeTomaso similarities, Erik V. Berg | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |