>sale (mainly from Hemmings of the few months prior to my loss) and
>established my car to be about condition #3 (which it was). I was paid
>$7000 (in 1992).
-------------
Sounds about right. Or as I said earlier, about the same as in '80. That's
depreciation, not appreciation.
-------------
I hate to
>say it, but the AMC connection is probably hurting Bricklin's value. Now
>if it was Camaro parts instead, the value may be double.
-------------
My sentiments exactly. Add Bricklin the man and you get zippo respect in the
auto world.
GM
|