ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Hell met

To: "Donald McKenna" <donbarbmckenna@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Hell met
From: "PAUL TIBBALS" <pault151@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:47:47 -0800
Don,
Since it's off topic I'll keep it short.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Donald McKenna" <donbarbmckenna@earthlink.net>
> article, I have to wonder where a lot of motorcyclist's "heads" are. Is a
> "beanie" helmet, that is "M" rated, really safe?
>
> Hard for me to believe it is.

There are no beanies that are Snell rated, M or otherwise.  The beanies are
basically there due to DOT allowing them, and some motorcyclists' beliefs
that not being able to hear through a regular helmet is a bigger hazard to
them than not being protected.  I think that they're ridiculous, but maybe
they serve the purpose of keeping a few riders out of the "long term care
paid for by taxes" ward.
>
> And, while on my "anti-motorcycle-rider" thread, anybody or everybody who

Umm, could we maybe think along the "hate the sin, tolerate the sinner"
here?  Perhaps you could make it an anti-loud-exhaust thread?  And it ain't
just Harley riders, though the offenders in that group are often quite loud
and noticeable.  I ride a cycle with stock exhaust, and hate loud pipes.
Mostly for the bad rap that they give all bikers, causing knee jerk
reactions that cause non-bikers to write anti-motorcycle-rider threads.
Loud pipes risk all motorcyclists' rights to being treated equally and
fairly.  Why do some have loud pipes?  _IMO_ the obvious reasons are
juvenile, anti-social, and or amoral attitudes.
....
> after-market noise-makers.
>
These pipes are mostly not legal.  Ask your local officers why they don't
pull over bikers for loud pipes more often, as I sure wish that they would!
Paul T.          p.s. any responses off-topic may be sent to my mailbox
rather than auto-x list.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>