ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Triumph TR8s

To: ba-autox@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: Triumph TR8s
From: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 04:41:04 EST
In a message dated 11/9/04 10:56:14 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
76067.1750@compuserve.com writes:


>       The problem with the TR8/Tiger is that the original collection of
> interior bits and pieces was assembled by Jim McKamey, the guy who chaired
> the Prepared Autocross Committee when Patrick requested his Elise to be
> classified. Mr. McKamey decided the bits and pieces assembled in Indiana
> are a different commodity than those assembled in the United Kingdom. Can
> we say Mr. McKamey had a philosophical problem? His decision leaned toward
> a product Made in the USA.
>         And to add to all of the above, Gordon Kinney has requested his
> McKamey-built collection of bits and piece be reclassified into B Prepared
> for 2005. And the Solo Events Board has granted his wish. 
>         If it all looks like a fairy tale, you're right.
> 
Jesus, John, are you really this stupid, or are you just pretending the black 
helicopters are taking off, looking for Lotus owners?

The Tiger and the TR-8 are both cars that were sold in the U.S. by their 
manufacturers.  You know damned good and well that the Kinney car runs as a car 
built in excess of the Prepared Category rules, and as such takes a 10% weight 
penalty for running in that configuration.

And yes, the Tiger will be in BP.  A real Tiger will run at an appropriate 
weight for the class, and Kinney's will take a weight penalty for being 
prepared 
in excess of Section 17.  It's not a fairy tale, there's no conspiracy, and 
there's nothing wrong with it.  You just like stirring up $#!*.  As much mud as 
you sling at SCCA, I'm amazed that you are permitted to be a member.  Why 
don't you resurrect NCCSCC so you can run your Lotus at 900 lbs. like it was 
when 
everything was right with the world in the 60's?

Charlie






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>