ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Divisional Entries

To: craig boyle <craig_autox@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Divisional Entries
From: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:52:24 -0700
Craig,
        Yes, it would add a bunch of work, but was possible and done prior to
last year, which I believe was the first stand-alone divisional we
(actually Sac Chapter) did in many years. The one time previously we
tried it, it went bust financially. 
        The results would be a matter of producing three sets of results, one
for the divisional and two for the two rounds. And a heck of a lot of
postage and paper! :)
        The entries were definitely higher, and I think 190 is a good number.
Just sorry I'm going to miss it because of previous very important
plans, made before the divisional was scheduled.
--Pat K
craig boyle wrote:
> 
> --- Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net wrote:
> > I seem to recall people complaining whenever the
> > Divisional is a SFR event
> > because they don't like getting beaten by outside
> > talent.  (I personally
> > regard this as a rather provincial attitude, but am
> > reporting it for what
> > it's worth.)  You'd have to do something like Craig
> > suggested by taking
> > out the non-SFR members to satisfy that contingent.
> 
> Try thinking "customer focused", if people don't show
> at divisionals, let's try and encourage them to do so
> instead of calling them "provincial".  If strong
> opposition shows up, the div is a de-facto points
> drop, therefore eliminate non-SFR people for that one
> event from the points.
> 
> .. of course, Pat and Jerry might not like this
> complication to much :-)
> 
> Craig
> Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
> http://buzz.yahoo.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>