I believe what Charlie's talking about is putting Patrick Jones' Lotus
Elise in A Prepared. That's a little different from moving a car already
nationally classed from one class to another. The impact on A Prepared
is not nearly as heavy with the Elise as the M3 is in ESP. Who knows,
maybe Rich Urschel will go back to OSP, so that leaves two, counting the
Elise, in AP. No biggy, and none of the local AP folks will protest
Patrick's presence in the class. We invited him into the class in the
first place!
--Pat Kelly
Kevin Stevens wrote:
>
> Please, please tell me y'all are kidding?! Why on EARTH would we want to open
> the can of worms of classing cars differently locally than nationally? Why
> would anyone even suggest such a thing, never mind get it approved???
>
> KeS
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net
> > [mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Navid Kahangi
> > Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 15:15
> > To: Kirk Meline; 'Kelly, Katie'; ba-autox@autox.team.net
> > Subject: RE: M3 BHP?
> >
> >
> > Kirk,
> >
> > Check this month's Spotscar. It doesn't matter though, because as Charlie
> > said, we are going to continue to run M3s in ESP locally next year.
> >
> > --Navid
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net
> > > [mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Kirk Meline
> > > Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 2:35 PM
> > > To: 'Kelly, Katie'; ba-autox@autox.team.net
> > > Subject: RE: M3 BHP?
> > >
> > >
> > > Katie
> > >
> > > I'll believe it when I see it.
> > >
> > >
> > > Kirk
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kelly, Katie [mailto:kkelly@spss.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 1:40 PM
> > > To: ba-autox@autox.team.net
> > > Subject: RE: M3 BHP?
> > >
> > >
> > > When is somebody going to tell Kirk that the M3 has been
> > > reclassed into BSP?
> > >
> > > Katie
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kirk Meline [mailto:KMeline@iscribe.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 1:26 PM
> > > To: 'Jim Ochi'; Barry Spencer; navid@interwoven.com;
> > > ba-autox@autox.team.net
> > > Subject: RE: M3 BHP?
> > >
> > >
> > > Jim and Navid:
> > >
> > > You guys must think that we are all stupid. All those changes
> > > just to get a
> > > few more horses. Give us all a break and just be honest. You already win
> > > ESP outright. There is no need to be outright dishonest.
> > >
> > > Kirk
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jim Ochi [mailto:jochi@ricochet.net]
> > > Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 12:30 PM
> > > To: Barry Spencer; navid@interwoven.com; ba-autox@autox.team.net
> > > Subject: RE: M3 BHP?
> > >
> > >
> > > I keep telling Navid that putting a Midas muffler on his M3 doesn't count
> > > as a performance mod no matter how large of a tip he puts on it, but he
> > > just doesn't listen! Taping magnets onto his throttle body doesn't add
> > > anything, nor does putting on all those stickers...
> > >
> > > Anyway, I believe it's 240 at the flywheel, something like 205 at
> > > the rear
> > > wheels stock. Common mods on a 95 (intake, chip, air flow meter,
> > > exhaust)
> > > get you to around 265 at the flywheel, 225 at the rear wheels...
> > >
> > > Jim
> > >
> > > At 12:25 PM 12/22/2000 -0800, Barry Spencer wrote:
> > > >How come you lose 15 after mods?.
> > > >
> > > >At 12:00 PM 12/22/00 -0800, Navid Kahangi wrote:
> > > > >Not enough! 240 stock, 225 after mods. :)
> > > > >
> > > > >--Navid
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net
> > > > > > [mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Barry Spencer
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 11:40 AM
> > > > > > To: ba-autox@autox.team.net
> > > > > > Subject: M3 BHP?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To all,
> > > > > > How much BHP does a 1995 BMW M3 have?.
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > Barry
|