Hmmm, I listened to part of the debate on the radio. This gives me the
idea for the best way to follow the debates:
On the radio... with the sound turned off. :)
Keith Hearn
'99 Miata 10AE "Sexy Sadie" the Sapphire Shark
B-Stock
Milpitas, CA
In message <93456CB7A08FD211B33D00A0C99D6373523584@SFEMAIL1>, "Kelly, Katie" wr
ites:
> I know everybody's worried about whom to vote for at the upcoming elections.
> Watching the debates makes your choice that much harder. Well, I can't tell
> you who the best candidate is, but might I offer a suggestion to at least
> make the next debate more entertaining? Watch the debates with the sound
> turned off. Last night, they split the screen, as I'm sure you noticed.
> Probably, with the sound turned up, you were too busy listening to what the
> candidates were saying. With the sound turned off, you could just sit and
> watch their faces, as my Russian teacher and I did last night. I can't
> recall laughing so hard. Between Bush's schoolboy, needy, whiny gestures,
> and Gore's pseudo-charm (all much more evident with the sound turned off),
> it doesn't help me make a decision, but it is, somehow, telling. I really
> liked watching their reactions to the other's statements. Gore rolls his
> eyes and smirks (total high school), and Bush acts like he's about to spit
> up his coffee. It's like you don't even need to know what they are saying to
> know what they are saying. Bush has an innocent and naive quality about him,
> like he's been busted, sitting in the principle's office. I find it
> endearing. At times, watching Gore, it looked as though he seemed confident
> and sincere and knowledgable. Again, that was with the sound turned off. I'm
> not thrilled imagining either of them conversing with other world leaders.
>
> No autox content, yes, but I thought I'd just point it out.
>
> Cheers,
> Katie K.
|