My issue is that we don't have an STS class, the PAX
part of it is incidental.
Craig
--- John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com> wrote:
> RE; Craig BVoyle's thoughts on PAX as it applies . .
> .
>
> Well, you have a valid complaint. But then I don't
> really feel sorry for
> anyone who HAS to use the PAX index to achieve
> success. I've long been in
> favor of heads-up competition by class.
>
> That AAS has chosen to make the former A
> Prepared into a PAX class
> called Prepared 1 is, IMHO, most unfortunate.
> That AAS uses PAX for anything is, IMHO, the
> wrong way to go. But
> since I'll probably run fewer than 50% of AAS'
> events, it's probably no big
> deal.
>
> PS: Have you taken a good look at ALL the
> local classes that seem
> to have popped up in SFR? We have more local classes
> than I ever recall
> voting for (or against).
>
> --John Kelly
>
|