autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [evolution-disc.] annual tech and online rules?

To: "'Evolution Discussion'" <evolution-discussions@yahoogroups.com>,
Subject: RE: [evolution-disc.] annual tech and online rules?
From: "Greg Ward" <gward@spokes.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:11:55 -0600
Thanks ... didn't know that already happens :-)

That confirms my belief that it is a meaningless and unnecessary requirement. 

Greg
'04 Spokes Pres.
'00 Miata SM2 79

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Rogerson [mailto:jrogerson@houston.rr.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 10:35 AM
> To: Greg Ward; 'Evolution Discussion'; 'autox mailing list'
> Subject: RE: [evolution-disc.] annual tech and online rules?
> 
> 
> You'd win that bet, if you could get anyone foolish enough to take 
> it.  When books are sold on site, that's how they are presented.
> 
> At 10:09 AM 11/25/2004, Greg Ward wrote:
> >I'll bet that I could present a book still in its
> >wrapping and satisfy the requirement.
> 
> 
> "The difference between extra-marital sex and extra marital sex is not to 
> be sneezed at."   - George Will
> I always turn to the sports section first.  The sports section records 
> people's accomplishments; the front page nothing but man's failures.  ~Earl 
> Warren
> Are your Congressmen and Senators good for the US or just your 
> district?  Check them out here-> http://www.lerner.udel.edu/econ-e/  






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>