autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [evolution-disc.] UD/BD Explained (was Fastrack)

To: "Team.net List" <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [evolution-disc.] UD/BD Explained (was Fastrack)
From: "Mike Smith" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 06:53:34 -0400
It wasn't necessary.... The generic 88-91 Civic line would have been
sufficient.

Had the listing not changed last year, an '88 Civic STD owner would have
used the engine/tranny from any 88-91 Civic EX.

EX's have the same engine/tranny as the '89-'91 Si, so the result would have
been identical.

The lines were combined after this was realized.

Mike

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>
To: <evolution-discussions@yahoogroups.com>; <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: [evolution-disc.] UD/BD Explained (was Fastrack)


> Here's a question for you Franken-Civic guys;  Had the SP listing not
> changed last year to include '88 Civics on the same line as '89-'91's,
would
> you have gone to the trouble of a total makeover/swap?
>
> Just curious.  Perhaps the problem really lies in the SP listing.
>
> Eric Linnhoff
> www.geocities.com/eric10mm/KnuckleDragger
> "Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities. Truth isn't."
> Mark Twain

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>