autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: was Is A-stock soft? now BS?

To: "David W. James" <vnend@adelphia.net>, autox <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: was Is A-stock soft? now BS?
From: David Hedderick <davebs14@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 13:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
My interpretation is that if there were more people
running 968's (Faulkner, Murrary, etc.) then they
would be competitive with the Boxster and the S2000.
That's at least my opinion.  :-)

David


--- "David W. James" <vnend@adelphia.net> wrote:
> At 3:11 PM -0700 6/7/02, Joe Goeke wrote:
> >This is VERY true.  Look at what the Kazlak's did
> in the 968.  This car is
> >way underated, and can easily run with the S2000
> and Boxster.  The data
> >shows it.  With this, you have three top running
> cars for the class, and we
> >have good pariticipation.  Just what is broken
> here?
> 
> >---JHG
> 
>       A-stock, not B-Stock? :-)
> 
> David
> -- 
> David W. James                        vnendNOSPAM@adelphia.net
>                      Remove spam block to send
> email.
>    "Ignorance is the mother of adventure." Hagar the
> Horrible
> 
> ///  unsubscribe/change address requests to
> majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
> ///  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
> ///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
> ///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive
> ///  Send list postings to autox@autox.team.net
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>