GH wrote...
> I have no intention of taking sides in the discussion, it simply puzzles
> me that everyone advocating putting Solo on TV seems to assume that
> nothing but good things would come out of it.
I guess I might be one of the targets of this post, so I'll respond.
I don't assume good things would come from Solo on TV. I don't even
necessarily think it should be on TV.
I just have a problem with the explanations provided as to why it is
not on TV, which are essentially, "It costs too much" and "It isn't
interesting to watch".
The latter doesn't matter, and former just makes no sense when you look
at other programming.
--
D a v i d H i l l m a n
hillman@planet-torque.com
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/wilma/autox
|