Ok Eric, how 'bout "meets the letter of the law" with respect to emissions
and equipment. The letter of the law, if not necessarily the intent. I
don't think you'll have much luck finding anything more b&w than that. Now,
I guess the next question is gonna be "which laws?", since just about every
locality has it's own set of specifics. As far as suspension is concerned,
I've seen some pretty wierd stuff here in the SouthWest. Now, it was legal,
but not anything that I'd be willing to put up with (or be seen in). Did
that muddy up the point at all? 8)
Bob....
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 05:57:45 -0500, Bill Fuhrmann wrote:
> > From: Linnhoff, Eric <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>
> > > Streetable. Now, define it for me in black and white terms. Or is
it
> > like
> > > pornography in that we all know it when we see it but we just
> > can't put a
> > > good definition to it?
>
> > From: David Hedderick
> > passes emissions tests, and isn't a pain (literally)
> > to drive. My car fits this. Its a mild CSP miata with
>
> I think that the definition passed into the big gray zone with the last
> criteria since that will be different for different people.
>
> Your car might be considered painful by others, hence the definition
doesn't
> work as a rule.
_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
/// autox@autox.team.net mailing list
///
/// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// with nothing in it but
///
/// unsubscribe autox
///
/// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///
|