autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Small classes / re-classing

To: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Small classes / re-classing
From: GSMnow@aol.com
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 02:23:20 EDT
Bob Monday wrote:

<< When was the last time an undersubscribed class was dropped, and STAYED 
dropped? Maybe F125 needs to bite the bullet to make room for the "much 
needed fast stock class", rather than screwing with DS, ES, GS and HS.
The latter classes didn't seem to have any problem making their
numbers, most of which with significant diversity! >>

I don't know about dropping F125, it sure looks like fun ;-), but I do very 
much agree about the destruction of the stock classes they have proposed. I 
have written a couple e-mails to the SEB and have not heard anything back, 
and I plan to write some snail mail also. All od the classes in question were 
well subscribed with good diversity except for DS which was still large, but 
dominated by Neons. ES had all but one trophy going to a Celica, but they 
were vastly different Celicas, and just out of trophies there were a bunch of 
very different cars that put up a good fight. GS had Acura, Honda, BMW, 
Chevy, Audi and Mitsubishi all taking trophies. HS had Honda, BMW, Toyota, 
and Volkswagon all taking trophies. 

These classes combined to bring in a huge number of racers, why do we want to 
mess with it? Sure the times were close, but the cars are by no means a 
match. Maybe a few cars could move, but there still needs to be 4 classes for 
this many cars. In open alone we are talkin 128 drivers this year, include 
the ladies and you get another 24 to bring it to 152 drivers in these 
classes. It sure does not look broken to me.

SS and AS drew a total of 94 open and 31 ladies, for 125 drivers total, and 
it was good close competition there also. Where is the "problem"

Gary M.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Small classes / re-classing, GSMnow <=