>From thesaurus.com
http://www.thesaurus.com/cgi-bin/search?config=roget&words=inferious
and
http://www.thesaurus.com/cgi-bin/search?config=roget&words=pugniable
As you can see we are making up words again, see it's the rotor head's way
of making us all feel stupid HA
Jeff Lloyd (and the bimmer goes boing boing boing)
Computer Modeling my new motor for SM2 ~300hp from 2litres on pump gas, and
no "apex" seals or millions of vacuum hoses
Just two little sequential turbochargers and four bumping pistons WOOSH!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-autox@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-autox@autox.team.net]On
Behalf Of Kevin Stevens
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 4:20 PM
To: autox@autox.team.net
Cc: smokerbros@aol.com
Subject: Re: RX7 displacement (was:Z06 Corvette and Nationals?)
(thumbing through Lewis Carroll books to find "inferious" and "pugniable"!)
KeS
>From: "Chuck McMillion" <chuck@decaturnet.com>
>Reply-To: "Chuck McMillion" <chuck@decaturnet.com>
>To: <autox@autox.team.net>
>Subject: Re: RX7 displacement (was:Z06 Corvette and Nationals?)
>Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 15:11:00 -0500
>
>um,
>no
>
> Displacemnt is measured by the volume of "open"space in the
>epichrod
>with the rotor in it.
>
>They displace 654 cc per rotor (13B)
>multipling by 1.4 is merely a tool used by the SCCA to specify Pressure
>charged cars vs Naturally aspirated.
>
>It isn't the Rotaries fault that a Piston engine is inferious by basic
>design (some comapies have come in leaps and bound in Pston engine
>technology ie Honda VTEC)
>
>there are three rotor faces, but the displacment between them is still
>654cc (divide that by 3 and that is the per rotor face volume.) you are
>mutiplying it by 9 in your calculations
>
>You aren'y being pugniable about all this are you?
>I am not, i am simply trying to help you understand the rotary from a
>rotorhed.
>
>Take it easy,
>Chuck
________________________________________________________________________
|