autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Classes)

To: "\"'<washburn@dwave.net>'\" <"<washburn@dwave.net>
Subject: Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Classes)
From: Engstrom <engstrom@onramp.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:34:41 -0500
Pat Washburn wrote:

> I wish I could have a lot less static negative camber on my Neon.  It
> just causes poor acceleration and braking traction IMO.  (See my small
> pile of front tires with the inside edge worn to the cord) I would trade
> static neg camber for a better dynamic camber geometry any day!
>
> Pat

Pat,

you really shouldn't feel bad.  The -1 degree of static camber and 7 degrees
of caster I have on my car is really overrated....really, I wouldn't lie to 
you. ;-)

John "Mod cars - lots of adjustments to really mess things up" Engstrom

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>