autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Car Classing Theory and Practice

To: "'Rex Tener'" <rex_tener@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Car Classing Theory and Practice
From: Jeff Winchell <jwinchell@Giftspot.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 16:33:13 -0700
I appreciate the humor...

but when I'm trying to solve the ESP M3 problem and people tell me "just
make an argument about the type of car." It seems like an impossible task
since there's so much inconsistency in how cars are classed.


-----Original Message-----
From: Rex Tener [mailto:rex_tener@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 4:23 PM
To: Jeff Winchell; 'Murray, Matthew D.'
Cc: 'autox@autox.team.net'; Rex Tener
Subject: RE: Car Classing Theory and Practice


At 02:19 PM 5/31/2000 -0700, Jeff Winchell wrote:
> >Lemmy think. . . . A Stock? Porsches (968, 944S2, Boxster, pre-'95 911),
> >BMWs
> >(M3, Z3 [open & coupe]), MR2, TVR, 300ZX, S2000. Drivers? Kozlaks, GH
Sharp,

 >Well, it's diverse all right. But what is the theory/reason on why these
 >cars were chosen to be in there?

Too slow for Super Stock and too slow for B-Stock. :-)

--
Rex Tener
rex_tener@yahoo.com
1995 BMW M3, SCCA SFR Solo II A-Stock #139


__________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>