autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Chicago Box (was Peru Pro)

To: "Curt and Kim Bennett - Houston Region" <ktetzloff@worldnet.att.net>,
Subject: Re: Chicago Box (was Peru Pro)
From: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 23:12:30 -0700
Whose Lotus would that be?  IIRC, the Kellys' Lotus is ~900 lb with 70 hp,
though I could be wrong.

Scot - who's seen the Kellys' Lotus in action many, many times (I'm an SFR
d00d)

----- Original Message -----
From: Curt and Kim Bennett - Houston Region <ktetzloff@worldnet.att.net>
To: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>
Cc: Mari L Clements <mrndr2@juno.com>; <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: Chicago Box (was Peru Pro)


> Yeah right, don't be intimidated by a 1500 pound car with 190 horsepower.
>
> -Curt
>
> Pat Kelly wrote:
>
> > Yeah...since then the national courses have become much wider so there
> > is no advantage to having a skinny car.
> > BTW, don't be put off by the name "Lotus." It's just a car and any car
> > can be made to handle like a Lotus.
> > --Pat Kelly
> >
> > Mari L Clements wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 24 May 2000 08:01:09 -0700 Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>
> > > writes:
> > > > The problem with earlier Chicago Boxes wasn't so much the visual
> > > > distraction but the distance between the entrance and exit was less
> > > than the
> > > > prescribed 45 foot minimum now required in slaloms. Only the very
> > > skinny cars
> > > > could fit through with hardly a lift.
> > > > --Pat Kelly
> > >
> > > Like, say, a Lotus? ( :
> > >
> > > mlc
> > > '91 MR2 NA
> > > -----anything after this, I didn't write, and don't necessarily agree
> > > with----
> > >
> > > ________________________________________________________________
> > > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
>
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>