> Kind of like the BMW M3 Lightweight. It's available (admittedly in limited
> numbers), and it's a stripped down car very much like the Neon ACR. In fact
> you might think of the ACR as a "poor man's M3 LTW." Yet the M3 LTW is not
> stock legal. At all. Even directly from the factory. That's because the
> factory modified it for racing. Yet we all know how the Neon ACR dominates.
> What's the difference here? And I don't buy that the only difference is
> that a lot of ACRs were made, and the M3 LTW isn't stock legal solely
> because of its low production numbers. I don't have the answer, nor am I
> stuck to a particular opinion on the matter - I just find this comparison
> interesting...
>
> - Justin
Funny you mention that. I wanted an ///M3 but didn't think that I could
afford one, so I settled for my TYPE R instead. I guess that was my
choice for a poor mans ///M3. But hey, I'm happy with it so that is all
that matters!
Any other drivers out there that wanted an ///M3 but settled for something
else?
Mark River Jahnke
98 Integra TYPE R #1098 Supercharged
http://www.performancechicago.com
|