sorry for the confusion, it's seems to me I hear the arguments all the time
locally too, which drives me up the wall, I didn't realize many of the folks
posting are familiar with nationals. I'm not since I haven't attended.
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>
To: Pete Gallo <PeteG@ij.net>
Cc: team.net <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA
> Pete Gallo wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>
> > To: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
> > Cc: team.net <autox@autox.team.net>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 12:58 PM
> > Subject: Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA
> > >> You're assuming the CAR is responsible for this performance. If
> > >> you take the best DRIVERS and put them in a mediocre car, they'll
> > >> STILL win.
> > >
> > > LOL! Give me a break! That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever
> > > heard!
> > >
> > Not only do they (the national drivers) win in "slower" DS cars, some
jump
> > to HS or GS (slower classes) and still compete for top time of day!
> > Sometimes only loosing out to SP or higher classed cars, it's the driver
> > 80-90%, the car is the rest.
>
> Er, we were talking about Nationals... The next time a stock car takes
> TTOD at Nationals let me know.
>
> Paul Foster
|