autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ST Classification..any solid rules?

To: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com, autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: ST Classification..any solid rules?
From: "Larry Spector" <larry_spector@flashmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 10:45:24 -0500
On 2 Apr 99, at 4:53, Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com wrote:
> 
> If the car isn't allowed in ST, it isn't allowed in STR or STU.  Under your
> scenario, ANY car would be legal for STU.  I understand how you are
> starting with a derivative of a legal car, but the fact remains that if the
> car isn't eligible, it doesn't matter what family lines it has.  You must
> look at it like this:  GSX - illegal for ST, Viper GTS - illegal for ST.
> They both are still illegal for STU...
> 
> Wait a minute, are we assuming that you can add a turbo where there was
> none before in STU?
> 
That was my assumption. I thought that forced induction was 
allowed in STU. If that's not true then forget what I said... If it is true 
however- if you started with a non-turbo car and added the factory 
turbo motor you'd wind up with a legal clone of the factory turbo car.

-Larry


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>