autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: ST Classification..any solid rules?

To: "'whitney'" <whitneys@mindspring.com>,
Subject: RE: ST Classification..any solid rules?
From: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 09:20:20 -0700
So..a 350Hp stock VR4 is legal too..right?  Now, lemme crank up another 150
-easy- hp for STU, of if im really mean, 200.

Im just of the opinion, that ST is built for the ricers, cars that were
-never- meant to be a performance car in the first place.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: whitney [SMTP:whitneys@mindspring.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 1999 11:51 AM
> To:   Mohler, Jeff; autox@autox.team.net
> Subject:      Re: ST Classification..any solid rules?
> 
> I believe the GSX/talon AWD fits, because the 2WD version is ST legal, and
> the unlimited drivetrain allowance would cover the AWD system.  Check with
> Howard Duncan to be sure, but I have brought it up to them before, and
> remeber it being OK.
> 
> Stan Whitney
> 
> DP/EP CRX  (still for sale - now a Natl. tour winner)
> GS Talon AWD 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>